In mHealth, apps can be a mixed blessing

Privacy and security realities hit David Collins hard.

Looking forward to cracking 1,000 Twitter followers at HIMSS13, the senior director of mHIMSS had 967 – until his account was compromised.

“I got hacked and I can’t get back in,” Collins said during Sunday's Preparing for an OCR Audit session at HIMSS13. “I have to open a new account so I’m starting to take this personally.”

Collins’ experience highlighted the lack of privacy and security policies and technologies in the new world of applications, healthcare and otherwise. An even bigger barrier, and one particular to health apps, he added, is a general lack of funding for investing in mHealth technologies.

“Here come the garage developers building solutions,” he explained. “They may not even understand healthcare.”

That wild west approach yields approximately 1,600 new mobile applications every day, Collins said, which makes it even more important for healthcare organizations to put policies in place around the use, privacy and security of mobile devices. According to HIMSS research, 68 percent of respondents have a policy in place, while 27 percent are currently creating one. And then there are the 4 percent who have no plans at all to adopt a policy alongside the 1 percent who don’t know and the 1 percent who fall into the “other” unexplained ether.

“Apps are the biggest opportunity,” Collins said, “and the biggest problem child right now.”

There’s evidence that may be starting to change. Examples include mobile healthcare store Happtique, which recently unveiled its own standards program for mHealth apps; the proposed Application Privacy, Protection and Security Act of 2013 (aka The Apps Act); and the Locations Privacy Protection Act that Minnesota Sen. Al Franken proposed in December 2012.

For healthcare organizations scrambling to sculpt a BYOD policy in reaction to the organic growth of mobile devices and applications, those and other federal policy initiatives are arriving none too soon.

“The app economy is almost half a million jobs. That’s up from zero in 2007,” Collins said. That’s the upside; the downside is a lack of specialization. Those developers “see a new market and they’re developing products based on their skill sets.”

The divide between the entrepreneurial IT spirit and the realities of healthcare privacy and security requirements are two different worlds, indeed, but they are starting to come together.
 

Comments

Edmund
“I got hacked and I can’t get back in" “Here come the garage developers building solutions,” he explained. “They may not even understand healthcare. ... could it be possible that he might not even understand IT.
David Campbell
David Collins mistakenly speaks about apps and their ecosystem as if they are a singularity. There have always been serious business software applications and others that are toys. Some designed to meet robust health care standards, some to render a stop watch on your desktop. There is no wild west. There are mobility ecosystems that provide the platform and development tools to which it takes time for the more robust healthcare developers to migrate from their legacy platforms. To characterize these vendors in the same "corral" as a widget developer is nonsensical. What will be changing is that these mobility ecosystems with the tools required for more useable clinical UIs will increasingly be a place where serious healthcare software is to be found.

Post new comment

* Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
No HTML code or hyperlinks are allowed in comments.
Login or create an account to save your mHIMSS profile.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.