Spyglass study: Physicians need more out of mobile technology

A new survey indicates physicians are embracing mobile health devices, but don’t see them changing the healthcare landscape just yet.

The report, “Point of Care Computing for Physicians 2012,” prepared by Spyglass Consulting, indicates 98 percent of physicians interviewed are using mobile devices to support both personal and professional workflows – but 83 percent are using desktop computers as their primary source for accessing patient data when at the hospital, clinic or home.

Mobile devices, the study indicates, are favored by physicians only when outside the office or home.

‘They’re very quick to point out that mobility has its place to address very specific workflows,” said Gregg Malkary, managing director of the Menlo Park, Calif.-based Spyglass Consulting Group.

Part of the problem, he said, lies in the pace of development. While the devices are being adopted “at a phenomenally rapid pace,” he said, they’re not being redesigned to fit the clinical needs of the physicians. For example, he said, the study indicates 80 percent of physicians surveyed believe the iPad shows promise for healthcare, but at present it can only be used as a communications platform.

“What we’re missing is innovative applications – native apps,” Malkary said.

“The iPad represents only one component of an overall end-to-end clinical solution,” he said. “Significant software innovation will be required to realize the vision for anytime, anywhere clinical computing. Clinical applications must be rewritten and optimized to take advantage of the native capabilities of the Apple iPad and other mobile devices including gesture-based computing, natural language speech recognition, unified communications and video conferencing.”

Likewise, Malkary said, while physicians are embracing mobile devices, hospital IT departments, which have generally invested a lot of time and money in desktop solutions, see mobility as a duplicate investment or, even worse, “a threat to the network.” According to the study, three of every four physicians surveyed said hospital IT executives are resistant to supporting mobile devices on the company network.

There are exceptions to the rule. The Palomar Pomerado Health System in San Diego, led by Chief Medical Information Officer Ben Kanter, MD, has developed a framework of applications to support mobile devices in the hospital.

“That’s the kind of thing you need – a clinical team redesigning applications to fit their workflow,” Malkary said.

The bottom line, Malkary said, is that physicians and hospitals are focused at the moment on meaningful use and being compensated for their time. Until mobile devices demonstrate a return on investment, he said, they’ll be regarded as nice to have, but not necessary.

“Bottom line, they need tools that can make them do their jobs better so they can make more money,” he said. “We need new ways to be able to interact with data.”
 

Comments

Colleen
And when you save people time, you save them money too.
Colleen
With the right solution, you're definitely getting a return on investment, by saving everyone's time including the doctor's, and providing better care. The doctor gets the message and is, on the spot without looking for a phone, able to think about the solution and still get back within a seconds to sender.
Now if you don't use a fully secure solution, one that either isn't encrypted (JCAHO banned text messaging) or one that stores messages ON the device, you're putting your staff and organization at risk with hefty fines and penalties.
Look at a solution that provides meaningful use of everyone's time and technology, while improving patient care, with the solution miSecureMessages.
Hope this helps!! :-)
Colleen
Colleen
With the right solution, you're definitely getting a return on investment, by saving everyone's time including the doctor's, and providing better care. The doctor gets the message and is, on the spot without looking for a phone, able to think about the solution and still get back within a seconds to sender.
Now if you don't use a fully secure solution, one that either isn't encrypted (JCAHO banned text messaging) or one that stores messages ON the device, you're putting your staff and organization at risk with hefty fines and penalties.
Look at a solution that provides meaningful use of everyone's time and technology, while improving patient care, with the solution miSecureMessages.
Hope this helps!! :-)
Colleen

Post new comment

* Fields marked with an asterisk are required.
No HTML code or hyperlinks are allowed in comments.
Login or create an account to save your mHIMSS profile.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.